Analysis on Asymmeric Precipitation ofthe Strong Typhoon Nesat (1117) Beforeand After Landing on Hainan Island
-
摘要: 利用NCEP 1 °×1 °再分析资料和卫星资料,以2011年强台风“纳沙”为例,分析了“纳沙”登陆海南岛前后的降水特征,并分析了“纳沙”周围TBB、湿度、水平风速和垂直速度在其路径两侧分布的不对称性,并从空间结构的分布上讨论了降水分布的可能成因。结果表明:登陆海南岛前后,“纳沙”的降水在其路径两侧的分布呈显著的不对称性,强降水主要集中在其路径左侧。“纳沙”除温度距平的分布较对称外,其它物理量在台风周围的空间结构均表现为显著的不对称性:(1)TBB,在路径左侧的强对流云系的强度和范围均比右侧大;(2)湿度,路径左侧的湿区范围比路径右侧大;(3)水平风速,台风位于海上和登陆时,路径右侧的最大风速比左侧强,台风登陆时其左右两侧最大风速相差20 m/s;在登陆前和登陆后路径右侧的相等大风速区范围比左侧大;(4)垂直速度,路径左侧的上升运动比右侧强,尤其在台风登陆时左侧的垂直上升速度比右侧大-2.4 Pa/s。通过对比上述物理量的非对称分布与降水分布可知,湿度可能是台风降水非对称分布的原因之一,而垂直速度可能是造成“纳沙”非对称降水的主要原因。另外,从垂直风切变作用进一步探究台风降水非对称性的形成机制,结果发现“纳沙”登陆前后的强降水均集中在顺切变方向及其左侧。垂直风切变可较好地解释路径左侧的强垂直上升运动和强降水区。此外海南岛的地形条件也导致“纳沙”在登陆期间海南岛西部的降水显著增加。Abstract: Using the NCEP 1 °×1 ° reanalysis data, satellite data, this paper takes the strong typhoon Nesat in 2011 for example to analyze the precipitation characteristics of the typhoon before and after landing on Hainan Island, and the asymmetry characteristics of TBB, humidity, horizontal wind speed and vertical velocity surrounding the typhoon on the left and right sides of the path, and discuss the possible causes of precipitation distribution from the aspect of the distribution of spatial structure. The results are showed as follows. Before and after landing on Hainan Island, the precipitation distribution of typhoon Nesat showed significant asymmetry, and heavy rainfall mainly concentrated on the left side of the path. In addition to relatively symmetricaltemperature anomalies, other physical quantities surrounding the typhoon showed significant asymmetry in the following points: (1) TBB. The intensity of strong convective clouds was greater, its range on the left side was larger than on the right side; (2) Moisture. The range of wet area on the left side was larger than on the right side; (3) Horizontal wind field. The maximum wind speed on the right side were stronger than on the left side when the typhoon was at sea and landed, especially when the typhoon landed maximum wind speed difference between the sides was up to 20m/s; the range of equal maximum wind speed on the right side was wider than on the left side before and after the landing of the typhoon; (4) Vertical velocity. Upward motion on the left side was stronger than on the right side, especially vertical rising velocity on the left side was -2.4 Pa/s stronger than on the right side when the typhoon landed. By comparing the distribution of the above physicswith the distribution of precipitation, we found that humidity may be one reason for the asymmetric distribution of precipitation, and the vertical speed may be the main reason for asymmetric precipitation of typhoon Nesat. From the vertical wind shear, we further explored the role of the formation mechanism of asymmetric typhoon precipitation and found that the heavy rainfall was concentrated in the shear direction and along the left side before and after the typhoon landed on Hainan Island. Vertical wind shear can better explain the strong vertical upward movement and heavy precipitation area on the left side of the path. In addition, Hainan Island terrain conditions also led to a significant increase in typhoon precipitation in the western part of theisland during the landing of typhoon Nesat.
-
图 4 同图 3,但为TBB显示的“纳沙”云系(单位:℃)演变与“纳沙”路径
虚线为过台风中心邻近整数格点且与路径相垂直的剖面基线。
图 9 9月29日14时850 hPa的水平风场(风向杆,单位:m/s)和水汽通量(等值线,单位:g/(cm·hPa·s))和地面降水量(阴影,单位:mm)分布
说明同图 2。
表 1 “纳沙”28日20时—30日14时每6小时的强度等级和移速的分布
时间/(日时) 2820 2902 2908 2914 2920 3002 3008 3014 台风强度 TY TY STY STY TY TY STS TS 速度/(m/s) 7.1 6.3 6.9 6.8 5.4 6.7 5.4 6.7 -
[1] 朱佩君, 郑永光, 郑沛群.华东登陆台风的对流非对称结构分析[J].热带气象学报, 2010, 26(6): 651-658. [2] CHAN JL, LIU KS, CHING S E, et al. Asymmetric distribution of convection associated with tropical cyclones making landfall along the South China Coast[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2004, 132(10): 2 410-2 420. [3] MARKSJr F D, HOUSE Jr R A, GAMACHE J F. Dual-aircraft investigation of the inner core of Hurricane Norbert, Part Ⅰ: Kinematic structure[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1991, 49(11): 919-942. [4] WILLOUGHBY H E, F D MARKS Jr, FEINBERG R J. Stationary and moving convective bands in hurricanes[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1984, 41(22): 3 189-3 211. [5] 陈镭, 徐海明, 余晖.台风"桑美"(0608) 登陆前后降水结构的时空演变特征大气科学[J]. 2010, 34(1): 105-119. [6] JONESRW. A simulation of hurricane landfall with a numerical model featuring latent heating by the resolvable scales[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1987, 115(10): 2 279-2 297. [7] 张建海, 沈桐立, 薛根元, 等.台风Rananim登陆后引发强降水成因和暴雨分布的诊断分析[J].海洋学研究, 2007, 25(2): 1-12. [8] MARKS F D. Evolution of the structure of precipitation inHurricane Allen (1980)[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1985, 113(6): 909-930. [9] CHAN J C L, LIANG X. Convective asymmetries associated with tropical cyclone landfall, Part 1: F-plane simulations[J]. J Atmos Sci, 2003, 60(4): 1 560-1 567. [10] MILLER B I. Rainfall rates in Florida hurricanes[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1958, 86(1): 258-264. [11] QIAN C H. Analysis and numerical simulation of Morakot rainfall[C]//Special lecture, 42 Typhoon Committee Meeting. 2010. [12] 石顺吉, 林秀斌, 吴陈峰, 等.强热带风暴"莲花"(0903) 非对称降水结构分析[J].海洋预报, 2010, 27(5): 64-71. [13] 林小红, 刘爱鸣, 刘通易, 等. 2013年"苏力"与"潭美"相似路径台风大暴雨落区差异分析[J].热带气象学报, 2015, 31(4): 517-525. [14] LONFAT M, MARKS F D, CHEN S S. Precipitation distribution in tropical cyclones using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission(TRMM)Microwave Imager: A global perspective[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2004, 132(7): 1 645-1 660. [15] 陈联寿, 智勇.中国热带气旋研究十年进展[J].大气科学, 2001, 25(3): 420-432. [16] RODGERS E B, CHANG S W, PIERCE H F. A satellite observational and numerical study of precipitation characteristics in western North Atlantic tropical cyclone[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1994, 33(1): 129-139. [17] 徐辉. 2011年以来登陆我国最强台风"纳沙"[N]. 中国天气网, [2011-10-05]. [18] 王远超, 梁祥毅, 林宝亭, 等. 1117号强台风"纳沙"造成广西持续大范围暴雨诊断分析[J].安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(26): 13 019-13 022. [19] 王志春, 植石群, 丁凌云.强台风纳沙(1117) 近地层风特性观测分析[J].应用气象学报, 2013, 24(5): 595-605. [20] 郑艳, 蔡亲波, 赵付竹, 等.强台风"纳沙"暴雨中尺度特征分析[J].自然灾害学报, 2014, 23(4): 134-141. [21] 杨仁勇, 闵锦忠, 郑艳.强台风"纳沙"引发的特大暴雨过程数值试验[J].高原气象, 2014, 33(3): 753-761. [22] 赵付竹, 郑艳, 李勋.强台风"纳沙"的路径和降水诊断分析[J].气象研究与应用, 2013, 34(1): 17-20. [23] PALMERCK, BARNES GM. The effect of vertical wind shear as diagnosed by the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data on northeast Pacific hurricane intensity[C]//American Meteorological Society25th Conf on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorological. San Diego: American Meteorology Society, 2002: 122-123. [24] RODGERS E B, PIERCE H F, CHANG S W. A Satellite Observational and numerical study of precipitation characteristics in Western North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1994, 33(1): 129-139. [25] KUOHC, YANG T T, CHANG C P. Typhoon Morakot(2009): Interplay of southwest monsoon, terrain, and mesoscale convection[C]//IntConfon Typhoon Morakot(2009). Taiwan: TTRFI, 2010. [26] 许向春, 于玉斌, 王式功, 等. "达维"(2005) 台风经过海南岛过程非对称降水的成因分析[J].热带气象学报, 2012, 28(5): 687-697. [27] MADDOX R A. Mesoscale convective complexes[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1980, 61(11): 1 374-1 387. [28] 游景炎, 段英, 游来光.云降水物理和人工增雨技术研究[M].北京:气象出版社, 1994: 202-205. [29] 赵付竹, 王凡, 郑艳. "纳沙", "尼格"强度和结构差异对海南暴雨分布的影响[J].广东气象, 2013, 35(2):14-20. [30] 钟敏, 吴翠红, 舒斯, 等. 湖北省冷锋型中尺度暴雨合成分析研究[C]//中国气象学会年会论文集. 北京: 中国气象学会, 2013. [31] JONESSC. The evolution of vortices in vertical shear, Part Ⅰ: Initially barotropic vortices[J]. Q J Roy Meteor Soc, 1995, 121(524): 821-851. [32] DEMARIA M. The effect of vertical shear on tropical cyclone intensity change[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1996, 53(14): 2 076-2 087. [33] BENDER M A. The effect of relative flow on the asymmetric structure of the interior of hurricanes[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1997, 54(6): 703-724. [34] WILLOUGHBY H E. Mature structure and evolution[M]//Global Perspectives on Tropical Cyclones. Elsberry R L, Ed, World Meteorological Organization Rep, 1995, TCP-38: 21-62. [35] MARKS Jr F D, HOUZE Jr R A, GAMACHE J F. Dualaircraft investigation of the inner core of Hurricane Norbert, Part Ⅰ: Kinematic structure[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1992, 49(11): 919-942. [36] FRANKLIN J L, LORD S J, FEUER S E, et al. The kinematic structure of Hurricane Gloria(1985) determined form nested analyses of dropwinsonde and Doppler wind data[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1993, 121(9): 2 433-2 451. [37] 陈国民, 沈新勇, 刘佳.垂直风切变对热带气旋强度和结构的影响[J].气象研究与应用, 2010, 31(1): 1-4. [38] 余贞寿, 陈敏, 叶子祥, 等.相似路径热带气旋"海棠"(0505) 和"碧利斯"(0604) 暴雨对比分析[J].热带气象学报, 2009, 25(1): 37-47. [39] 李瑞, 李本亮, 胡鹏, 等.环境垂直风切变对0509号台风"麦莎"的影响分析[J].海洋学研究, 2014, 32(2): 14-22. [40] FRANK W M, RITCHI E. Effects of environmental flow upon tropical cyclone structure[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1999, 127(9): 2 044-2 061. [41] WINGO M T, CECIL D J. Effect of vertical wind shear on tropical cyclone precipitation[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2010, 138(3): 645-662. [42] CORBOSIERO K L, MOLINARI J. The relationship between storm motion, vertical wind shear, and convective asymmetries in tropical cyclones[J]. J Atmos Sci, 2003, 60(1): 366-376. [43] CHENS S, KNAFF J A, MARKS F D. Effects of vertical wind shear and storm motion on tropical cyclone rainfall asymmetries deduced from TRMM[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2006, 134(1): 190-208. [44] UENO M. Observational analysis and numerical evaluation of the effects of vertical wind shear on the rainfall asymmetry in the typhoon inner-core region[J]. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2007, 85(2): 115-136. [45] SHAPIRO L J. The asymmetric boundary layer flow under a translating hurricane[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1983, 40(8): 1 984-1 998. [46] 杨仁勇, 闵锦忠, 郑艳.强台风"纳沙"引发的特大暴雨过程数值试验[J].高原气象, 2014, 33(3): 753-761. [47] 陈瑞闪.台风[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社, 2002: 375. [48] 郑艳, 蔡亲波, 程守长, 等.超强台风"威马逊"(1409) 强度和降水特征及其近海急剧加强原因[J].暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(4): 333-341. [49] 祝芳. 1223号强台风"山神"过程分析[J].科协论坛, 2013(8): 134-135. -
下载:
粤公网安备 4401069904700003号