Winnie(1997)和Bilis(2000)变性过程的湿位涡分析

李英; 陈联寿; 雷小途

Winnie(1997)和Bilis(2000)变性过程的湿位涡分析

1.
中国气象科学研究院, 北京, 100081
2.
上海台风研究所, 上海, 200030

基金项目: 国家自然基金资助项目(40175019);2004年上海台风研究基金资助

计量
- 文章访问数: 1097
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 1162
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2003-12-02
- 修回日期: 2004-07-28

MOISTURE POTENTIAL VORTICITY ANALYSIS ON THE EXTRATROPICAL TRANSITION PROCESSES OF WINNIE(1997) AND BILIS(2000)

1.
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 10081, China
2.
Shanghai Typhoon Institute, Shanghai 20030, China

摘要

摘要: 9711号台风Winnie和0010号台风Bilis均在中国大陆发生变性,但前者变性后再度加强,而后者变性后减弱消亡。从湿位涡理论出发,对比分析两者的变性过程,结果表明:作为变性台风,Winnie和Bilis均在北上过程中与中纬度西风槽发生作用,但前者与高空槽发生耦合,后者仅接近高空槽底部,没有发生耦合;Winnie变性加强过程表现为一个温带气旋在低层锋区上的强烈发展过程,主要与高层正位涡扰动下传、低层锋区及热带气旋低压环流之间的相互作用有关。P_m湿斜压项增长引起的倾斜涡度发展是登陆热带气旋变性加强的主要因子。在Bilis变性过程中,高层无明显的正位涡扰动下传,热带气旋低压环流内无锋区面出现,大气斜压性弱且变化不明显。
- 登陆台风 /
- 变性 /
- 加强 /
- 湿位涡
Abstract: Typhoon Winnie(9711) and Bilis(0010) underwent extratropical transition (ET) over Chinese mainland but only Winnie re-intensified as an extratropical system. Their ET processes were examined and compared in terms of the Moisture Potential Vorticity u (P_m) perspective. Results show that Winnie enters mid-latitude zone and couples with an upper trough during its ET. Bilis also approaches an upper trough but decouples with it. ET re-intensification is related to the interactions between typhoon remnant circulation and lower layer front zone and P_m anomaly downward transported from the upper troposphere. Especially, slantwise vorticity development caused by the increase of moist baroclinicity is an main factor responsible for Winnie re-intensification. However, there is no frontal zone occurring in Bilis's remnant circulation and downward transportation of the upper P_m anomaly is weak.
- landfalling typhoons /
- extratropical transition /
- re-intensification /
- P_m

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	陈联寿,丁一汇. 西太平洋台风概论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1979. 423-428.
[2]	KNOX J L. The storm Hazel,synoptic resume of its development as it approached Southern Ontario[J]. Bull Am Meteor Soc,1955, 36(1): 239-246.
[3]	DIMEGO D J, BOSART L F. The transformation of tropical storm Agnes into extratrpical cyclone. Part I: The Observedfields and vertical motion computations; Part II: Moisture vorticity and kinetic energy budgets[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1982, 110(5): 385-441.
[4]	谭锐志, 梁必骐. 登陆台风变性过程的诊断分析[J]. 大气科学,1990, 14(4): 422-431.
[5]	徐祥德, 陈联寿, 解以扬, 等. 环境大尺度锋面系统与变性台风结构特征及其暴雨的形成[J]. 大气科学, 1998, 22(5): 744-752.
[6]	HOSKINS B J,MCINTYRE M E , ROBERTSON A W. On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps[J].Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 1985, 111: 877-946.
[7]	JOHN Molinari, SKUBIS S, VOLLARO D, et al. Potential vorticity analysis of cyclone intensification[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1998, 55(14): 2632-2644.
[8]	BENNETTS D A , HOSKINS B J. Conditional symmetric instability-a possible explanation for frontal rainbands[J]. Quart JRoy Meteor Soc, 1979, 105: 945-961.
[9]	吴国雄, 蔡雅萍, 唐晓菁. 湿位涡和倾斜涡度发展[J]. 气象学报, 1995, 53(4): 387-404.
[10]	余晖,吴国雄. 湿斜压性与热带气旋强度突变. 气象学报[J]. 2001,59(4):440-449.
[11]	SINCLAIR M R. Synoptic-scale diagnosis of the extratropical transition of a southwest Pacific tropical cyclone[J]. Mon WeaRev,1993,121(9):941-960
[12]	BOSART L F, LACKMANN G M. Postlandfall tropical cyclone reintensification in a weakly baroclinic environment: A casestudy of Hurricane David(September 1779)[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1995, 123(11): 3268-3291.
[13]	朱佩君,郑永光,陶祖钰. 发生在中国大陆的台风变性加强过程分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2003, 19(2): 157-162.