硫酸盐直接辐射强迫的在线与固定转化率模拟方法的对比研究
COMPARISON OF ON-LINE COUPLED AND CONSTANT TRANS- MISSION SIMULATION METHODS FOR DIRECT RADIATIVE FORCING OF ANTHROPOGENIC SULFATE
-
摘要: 以2000年1、4、7、10月为例,利用区域气候模式,比较了模拟硫酸盐气溶胶分布和直接辐射强迫的在线模拟方法与固定SO2到硫酸盐转化率方法,并与全球模式的结果进行了对比检验。结果表明:在线模拟得到的主要结果与全球平均结果符合得很好,但固定转化率方法存在明显偏差;两种方法硫酸盐柱含量的差异在-4~12 mg/m2范围内,占在线模拟柱含量的42%以上,7月份差异最显著,1月份差异最小;大气顶辐射强迫差异在-1.8~0.4 W/m2之间,此差别占在线辐射强迫的26%以上;采用36.7%的固定转化率对冬季过大、夏季偏小,只有春秋季的江南部分地区适合。由于固定转化率方法不能反映温度、辐射、水汽、云水等气象要素的季节性变化对硫酸盐生成率的影响,因而对硫酸盐含量和分布的季节变化模拟存在偏差,这是导致上述差异的重要原因。Abstract: Two methods,on-line coupled and constant transmission,for radiative forcing simulation of anthropogenic sulfate over China area have been compared within Jan.,Apr.,Jul.and Oct.2000.The following results can be figured out based on the comparison:(1) The results of on-line coupling are consistent with global averaged results from GCMs.(2) Both column burden and radiative forcing at TOA of anthropogenic sulfate have obvious differences between the two simulation methods.(3) The maximum difference range of sulfate burden is from-4 to 12 mg/m2.Its maximum emerges in July and minimum value in January.The relative difference to that of on-line sulfate burden is more than 42% on the whole simulated area scale.If partial area averages are compared,their values are more than that of the whole area scale.(4) The difference of radiative forcing at TOA is within-1.8~0.4W/m2.The relative difference to that of on-line radiative forcing at TOA is more than 26% on the whole simulated area scale.(5) The results of constant transmission method differ from on-line or off-line methods fairly,and it is hard to give the fact of sulfate burden and radiative forcing.
-
[1] IPCC.Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis,Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M].Cambridge University Press,UK,2001.944. [2] KOCH D,JACOB D,TEGEN I,ct al.Tropospheric sulfur simulation and sulfate direct radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model[J].J Geophys Res,1999,104:23799-23822. [3] 吴兑.华南气溶胶研究的回顾与展望[J].热带气象学报,2003,19(增):145-151. [4] YUN Qian,FILIPPO Giorgi.Interactive coupling of regional climate and sulfate aerosol models over eastern Asia[J].J Geophys Res,1999,104:6477-6499. [5] 吴涧,蒋维楣,刘红年,等.硫酸盐直接和间接辐射气候效应的模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2002,22(2):129-134. [6] 高学杰,林一骅,赵宗慈.用区域气候模式模拟人为硫酸盐气溶胶在气候变化中的作用[J].热带气象学报,2003,19(2):169-176. [7] 吴涧,蒋维楣,刘红年,等.硫酸盐气溶胶直接辐射效应在线和离线模拟方法的比较[J].气象学报,2004,62(4):486-492. [8] BRUCE P B.Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model[J].J Geophys Res,1992,97(7):7603-7612. [9] 吕世华,陈玉春.区域气候模式对华北夏季降水的气候模拟[J].高原气象,1999,18(4):632-640. [10] 潘劲松,翟国庆,高坤.区域气候模拟中多种对流参数化方案的比较研究[J].大气科学,2002,26(2):206-220. [11] 范广洲,吕世华.高分辨嵌套区域气候模式对我国中、东部地区夏季气候的数值模拟[J].高原气象,1999,18(4):641-647. [12] 吴涧,蒋维楣,刘红年,等.我国对流层臭氧增加对气温的影响[J].高原气象,2003,22(2):132-142. [13] STREETS D G,BOND T C,CARMICHAEL G R,et al.An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia inthe year 2000[J].J Geophys Res,2003,108(D21),8809,doi 10.1029 /2002 JD 003093. [14] 王自发,黄美元,高会旺,等.关于我国和东亚酸性物质的输送研究Ⅱ.硫化物浓度空间分布特征及季节变化[J].大气科学,1998,22(5):693-700. [15] 王喜红,石广玉.东亚地区对流层人为硫酸盐气溶胶柱含量变化数值研究[J].气候与环境研究,2000,5(1):58-66. [16] 王体健,闵锦忠,孙照渤,等.中国地区硫酸盐气溶胶的分布特征[J].气候与环境研究,2000,5(2):165-173.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 915
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1135
- 被引次数: 0