中尺度模式中不同对流参数化方案的比较试验

李燕; 邱崇践; 张建国

中尺度模式中不同对流参数化方案的比较试验

1.
兰州大学资源环境学院, 甘肃, 兰州, 730000;大连市气象台, 辽宁, 大连, 116001
2.
兰州大学资源环境学院, 甘肃, 兰州, 730000
3.
大连市气象信息网络中心, 辽宁, 大连, 116001

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目“东海黑潮三维结构及季节变化研究”(40406009)资助

计量
- 文章访问数: 943
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 772
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2007-06-18
- 修回日期: 2008-08-04

THE COMPARATIVE TRIAL EXPERIMENTS WITH DIFFERENT CONVECTION PARAMETERIZATION SCHEMES IN MESOSCALE MODELS

1.
School of Resources and Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;Dalian Meteorological Observarory Dalian 116001, China
2.
School of Resources and Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
3.
Dalian Center of Meteorological Information Network, Dalian 116001, China

摘要

摘要: MM5模式中有多种积云参数化方案可供选择,粗细网格采用不同的积云参数化方案对降水预报有一定的影响。采用常用的四种积云参数化方案,粗细网格进行不同配置,对辽东半岛大暴雨过程进行试验发现:细网格信息可以通过嵌套边界向外层传递,影响外层预报结果。细网格选取GR方案比选取AK、BM、KF方案模拟效果好很多;细网格参数化方案不变,粗网格取不同的参数化方案,对细网格的模拟结果差别不大。但选取一个好的参数化方案对细网格的模拟结果会稍有改进。
- MM5模式 /
- 大暴雨 /
- 中尺度系统 /
- 数值模拟 /
- 对流参数化
Abstract: There are a number of cumulus parameterization schemes(CPSs) to choose from in the mesoscale numerical model MM5.The difference in CPSs for coarse and fine meshes will influence the precipitation forecast.This study adopts four common CPSs and different allocations of coarse meshes and fine meshes to simulate a heavy rainstorm process on Liao Dong Peninsula.The following points have been summarized.The information in the fine mesh can be transferred to outer layers across the nested boundary so as to affect the forecast results.If the GR scheme is used for the fine mesh,better simulation can be achieved than with the AK,BM or KF schemes.With parameterization scheme remaining unchanged in the fine mesh,its simulated results do not vary much with different parameterization schemes used in the coarse mesh.However,a good scheme will slightly improve the simulated results of the fine mesh.
- MM5 model /
- heavy rainstorm /
- meso-scale system /
- numerical simulation /
- convection parameterization

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	覃丽,寿绍文,刘泽军,等.一次"北涡南槽"型广西强降水过程的数值模拟与诊断分析[J].热带气象学报,2007,23(1):27-34.
[2]	赵磊刚,周毅,李昀英,等.一次台风暴雨过程的数值模拟和中尺度分析[J].热带气象学报,2007,23(5):453-458.
[3]	林文实,黄美元.积云参数化方案研究的现状[J].热带气象学报,1998,14(4):374-379.
[4]	王建捷,胡欣,郭肖容.MM5模式中不同对流参数化方案的比较试验[J].应用气象学报,2001,12(1):41-53.
[5]	顾建峰.不同深对流参数化方案在降水预报中的比较试验[J].气象,1999,25(4):39-44.
[6]	王晨稀.MM5模式中不同对流参数化方案对降水预报效果影响的对比试验[J].气象科学,2004,24(2):168-176.
[7]	康丽莉.99.6梅雨锋暴雨中云物理过程及MM5中湿物理过程的数值研究[D].南京:南京气象学院硕士论文,2002.
[8]	丁一汇.高等天气学[M].北京:气象出版社,1991:548-573.
[9]	WANG W,SEAMAN N L.A comparision study of convective parameterization schemes model[J].Mon Wea Rev,1997,125(2):252-278.
[10]	康丽莉,雷恒池,肖稳安.中尺度模式中各种湿物理过程的数值模拟[J].南京气象学院学报,2003,26(1):76-83.
[11]	GRELL G A,DUDHIA J,STAUFFER D R.A description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model(MM5)[R].NCAR TechnicalNote,NCAR/ TN 3 98+STR,1994:138.
[12]	李燕.辽东半岛一次暴雨过程的数值模拟研究[D].兰州:兰州大学硕士论文,2006.
[13]	GRELL G A,KUO Y H,PASCH R.Prognostic evaluation of assumeptions used by cumulus parameterization[J].Mon Wea Rev,1993,121:176-787.
[14]	KUO H L.On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones though latent heat release by cumulus convection[J].J Atmos Sci,1965,22(1):40-63.
[15]	KUO H L.Further studies of the parameterization of the effect of cumulus convection on large scale flow[J].J Atmos Sci,1974,31(5):1 232-1 240.