AN ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF ENSEMBLE SIZE ON MONTHLY MEAN OF 500-HPA GEOPOTENTIAL HEIGHT PREDICTION
-
摘要: 气候系统模式输出结果是当前开展气候预测业务的重要参考依据之一，如何提高气候系统模式输出结果的可信度是改进气候业务预测能力的关键之一。利用1999—2010年NCEP CFSv2模式每日四次预测未来45天的回算数据，分析了集合样本数对模式预测能力的影响。分析结果表明，模式对月平均500 hPa位势高度的预测技巧在热带地区较高，而中高纬度地区较低；模式对500 hPa位势高度时间异常的预测能力优于空间异常。无论是空间异常还是时间异常，随着模式超前时间的增加，预测技巧均逐渐降低，但是在不同区域和不同月份，模式预测技巧随超前时间的变化存在差异。此外，模式预测技巧存在非常大的年际变率。增加集合样本数，对不同月份和不同起报时间预测技巧的稳定度和预测技巧值均有明显正效果，特别是对亚洲中纬度地区改善度较大。增加集合样本数也可以在一定程度上降低模式预测技巧年际变率。集合样本数增加对于500 hPa位势高度空间异常的改进优于时间异常。
-
关键词:
- 模式评估 /
- 500 hPa高度场 /
- 集合预报 /
- 相关系数
Abstract: The output of climate system models is one of the important references for climate prediction. Enhancing the credibility of climate system models' output is one of the keys to improve climate forecasting. In this paper, the 45 days regression data of NCEP CFSv2 model predicted four times a day from 1999 to 2010 were used to analyze the influence of ensemble size on model prediction ability. The results showed that there were higher prediction skills on monthly mean of 500-hPa geopotential height in the tropics, but lower prediction skills in the middle and high latitudes. The temporal anomaly prediction skills of 500-hPa geopotential height were better than spatial anomaly prediction skills. The prediction technique of both spatial anomaly and temporal anomaly decreased gradually with the increase of the model lead time. However, the prediction skill varied with different lead time in different regions and months. In addition, there was large interannual variability in prediction skill of CFSv2 model. Increasing the numbers of ensemble size has a significant positive effect on the stability and the value of prediction skills in different months and at different starting times, especially on the improvement in prediction for the mid-latitude region of Asia. Increasing ensemble size can also reduce the inter-annual variability of model prediction skills to some extent. With the increase of ensemble size, the improvement of spatial anomaly prediction skills on 500-hPa geopotential height was better than the improvement of temporal anomaly prediction skills. -
图 2 亚洲中纬度地区（60~120 °E，30~60 °N）不同超前时间和集合样本数区域平均的年际相关系数序列图
相关系数在0.5以上，通过显著性水平α=0.1的显著性检验。
-
[1] MEEHL G A, COVEY C, TAYLOR K E, et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A new era in climate change research[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 2007, 88(9): 1 383-1 394. [2] SAHA S, MOORTHI S, WU X R, et al. The NCEP climate forecast system version 2[J]. J Climate, 2012, 27(6): 2 185-2 208. [3] PENG P, BARNSTON A G, KUMAR A. A comparison of skill between two versions of NCEP climate forecast system (CFS) and CPC is operational short-lead seasonal outlooks[J]. Wea Forecasting, 2013, 28(2): 445-462. [4] 程智, 徐敏, 段春锋.CFSv2模式对淮河流域夏季气温降水预测能力的评估[J].暴雨灾害, 2016, 35(4): 351-358. [5] 黄小梅, 蒋兴文, 肖丁木. NCEP CFSv2对中国2015年夏季月尺度降水和环流预报分析[J].高原山地气象研究, 2016, 36(4): 48-58. [6] JANG X W, YANG S, LI Y Q. Seasonal to interannual prediction of the Asian summer monsoon in the NCEP climate forecast system version 2[J]. J Climate, 2013, 26(3): 3 708-3 727. [7] LANG Y, YE A Z, GONG W, et al. Evaluating skill of seasonal of precipitation and temperature predictions of NCEP CFSv2 forecasts over 17 hydroclimatic regions in China[J]. J Hydrometeorology, 2014, 15: 1546-1599. [8] RIDDLE E E, BUTLER A H, FURTADO J C, et al. CFSv2 ensemble prediction of the wintertime Arctic Oscillation[J]. Clim Dyn, 2013, 41 (3): 1 099-1 116. [9] KIM H M, WEBSTER P J, CURRY J A, et al. Asian summer monsoon prediction in ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective seasonal forecasts[J]. Clim Dyn, 2012, 39: 2 975-2 991. [10] 黄小梅, 蒋兴文, 肖丁木. NCEP CFSv2对中国2015年夏季月尺度降水和环流预报分析[J].高原山地气象研究, 2016, 36(4): 48-58. [11] LUO L F, TANG W, LIN Z H, et al. Evaluation of summer temperature and precipitation predictions for NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast over China[J]. Clim Dyn 2013, 41(7): 2 213-2 230 [12] KIM H M, WEBSTER P J, CURRY J A. Seasonal prediction skill of ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the Northern Hemisphere Winter[J]. Clim Dyn, 2012, 39(): 2 957-2 973. [13] YUAN X, WOOD E F, LUO L F, et al. A first look at climate forecast system version 2 (CFSv2) for hydrological seasonal prediction[J]. Geophys Res Let., 2011, 38: L13402, doi:10.1029/2011GL047792. [14] 陈浩, 何晓凤.基于数值模式的月尺度近地层气象要素预报技术研究[J].热带气象学报, 2017, 33(1):74-83. [15] 苏同华, 薛峰.东亚夏季风环流和雨带的季节内变化[J].大气科学, 2010, 34(3): 611-628 [16] YANG H, SUN S Q. Study on the characteristics of longitudinal movement of subtropical high in the western Pacific in summer and its influence[J]. Adv Atmos Sci, 2003, 20(6): 921-933. [17] 陈月娟, 张弘, 周任君, 等.西太平洋副热带高压的强度和位置与亚洲地表温度之关系[J].大气科学, 2001, 25(4): 515-522 [18] 肖贻青.乌拉尔山阻塞与北大西洋涛动的关系及其对中国冬季天气的影响[J].高原气象, 2017, 36(6): 1 499-1 511. [19] 李艳, 王式功, 金荣花, 等.我国南方低温雨雪冰冻灾害期间阻塞高压异常特征分析[J].高原气象, 2012, 31(1): 94-101 [20] 高辉, 陈丽娟, 贾小龙, 等. 2008年1月我国大范围低温雨雪冰冻灾害Ⅱ:成因分析[J].气象, 2008, 34(4):101-106 [21] 陶诗言, 卫捷. 2008年1月我国南方严重冻雪灾害过程分析[J].气候与环境研究, 2008, 13(4): 337-350. [22] LI J P, SUN C, JIN F F. NAO implicated as a predictor of Northern Hemisphere mean temperature multidecadal variability[J]. Geohphys Res Lett, 2013, 40(20): 5 497-5 502. [23] YUAN W, SUN J Q. Enhancement of the summer North Atlantic Oscillation influence on Northern Hemisphere air temperature[J]. AdvAtmos Sci, 2009, 26(6):1 209-1 214. [24] 汪丽, 杨淑群, 杨小波. T639月动力延伸预报产品的检验[J].高原山地气象研究, 2009, 29(2): 41-44. [25] 刘佳, 徐金霞, 马振峰, 等.第二代月动力延伸预报产品对西南汛期降水的预报检验[J].高原气象, 2014, 33(6): 1 468-1 479. [26] 王阔, 马浩, 李娟, 等. POEM2模式对热带季节内振荡模拟能力的评估[J].热带气象学报, 2016, 32(3): 358-367. [27] 周兵.中国气候变化监测公报(2015)[M].北京:科学出版社, 2016:1-26. [28] 段明铿, 王盘兴, 吴洪宝. 500hPa位势高度场极端天气时间的NCEP集合概率预报效果分析[J].大气科学学报, 2011, 34(6): 717-724. [29] 陈静, 陈德辉, 颜宏.集合数值预报发展与研究进展[J].应用气象学报, 2002, 13(4): 479-507. [30] 汪叶, 段晚锁.初始扰动振幅和集合样本数对CNOPs集合预报的影响[J].大气科学, 2019, 43(3): 919-933. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 180
- HTML全文浏览量: 65
- PDF下载量: 81
- 被引次数: 0
粤公网安备 4401069904700003号