SATELLITE AND RADAR CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO THUNDERSTORMS DURING A CONTINUOUS STRONG STORM IN HUBEI PROVINCE AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH LIGHTNING ACTIVITY
-
摘要: 2018年5月17—18日, 湖北省一次连续强风暴过程中先后出现了不同类型的强对流天气。利用FY-4A卫星、雷达和地基闪电观测等资料, 对相似环境背景下17日夜间鄂西北强对流(第1阶段, 下同)和18日上午鄂东强对流(第2阶段, 下同)的环境背景和天气系统特征等差异进行分析, 提炼卫星雷达和闪电资料对分类强对流的预报依据。(1)此次连续强风暴是副高稳定维持, 西南涡东移, 暖式切变线触发形成的, 强对流出现在副高外围西南气流和低涡东侧的辐合区中, 第1阶段短波快速东移后中高层转为冷平流, 上干下湿的层结利于冰雹和大风出现, 第2阶段则处在槽前暖湿气流中, 湿层深厚, 探空对流有效位能CAPE中等强度, 出现持续性强降水的概率较大。地面中尺度涡旋促使强对流发展维持, 18日冷空气南下是第2阶段雷电密集的主要原因。(2)鄂西北强对流正闪比例较大, 正闪峰值时刻和降雹时刻几乎一致, 零星地闪分布在强回波外侧35~50 dBZ回波中, ≥60 dBZ强回波中并未观测到地闪, 鄂东强对流闪电频次较多, 以负闪为主, 密集的负闪分布在35~55dBZ强回波区, 零星正闪和强回波外围25~35 dBZ层状云对应, 以上雷达特征对分类强对流预警都有很好的指示意义。(3) FY-4A闪电成像仪资料LMI、云顶亮温TBB低值区和二维地闪探测位置吻合, LMI总闪和二维地闪随TBB低值中心移动, 冰雹和对流性大风的TBB更低, 分布在230 K以下, 强降水则在250~270 K。
-
关键词:
- FY-4A /
- Lighting Mapping Imager(LMI) /
- 强风暴 /
- 闪电活动
Abstract: From May 17 to 18, 2018, two thunderstorms occurred successively during a continuous severe storm in Hubei. Using data from FY-4 A satellite, radar and Advanced Toa and Direction system(ADTD), the present study analyzed the differences of environmental background and characteristics of the synoptic system of the two thunderstorms. Under similar environmental backgrounds, the first strong convection(referred to as the first stage) occurred in northwest Hubei at night on May 17 and the second(referred to as the second stage) happened in east Hubei on the morning of May 18. After the analysis, the basis for classification of strong convection by using satellite radar and lightning data were proposed. The results showed that: (1) The continuous strong storm was triggered by the warm shear line, which was resulted from the eastward movement of the southwest vortex, and the strong convection occurred in the convergence zone of the southwest airflow around the subtropical high and the east side of the vortex. At the first stage, cold advection developed in the middle and upper levels after the rapid eastward movement of short waves. The upper dry layer and the lower wet layer were favorable for the development of hail and gale. The second thunderstorm was in the warm humid air flow in front of the trough. The wet layer was deep, the sounding convection effective potential energy CAPE was moderately strong, and the probability of continuous heavy precipitation was relatively high. The meso-scale vortex on the ground promoted the development and maintenance of strong convection, and the southward movement of cold air on May 18 was the main reason for the heavy lightning at the second stage.(2) In northwest Hubei, the proportion of strong convective positive flashes was relatively large, and the peak time of positive flashes was almost the same as that of hail. The scattered flashes were distributed in the 35 ~ 50 dBZ echoes outside the range of strong echoes, and no flashes were observed in the strong echoes≥60 dBZ. In east Hubei, the strong convective lightning, especially negative lightning, was more frequent. The dense negative lightning was distributed in the 35 ~ 55 dBZ strong echo area, and the scattered positive lightning corresponded to the stratiform cloud of 25 ~ 35 dBZ around the strong echo. The above radar features could facilitate the classification and early warning of strong convection.(3) The data from FY-4 A Lightning Imager(LMI) and the low value area of cloud-top brightness temperature(TBB) were consistent with the detection positions of the ADTD. The total lightning of LMI and cloud to ground lightning of ADTD moved with the low-value center of TBB. The TBB of hail and convective gale was lower, which was below 230 K, and the heavy rainfall was between 250~ 270 K.-
Key words:
- FY-4A /
- lighting mapping imager /
- strong storm /
- lightning activity
-
-
[1] MCNULTY R P. Severe and convective weather: A central region forecasting challenge[J]. Wea Forecasting, 1995, 10(2): 187-202. [2] MILLER R C. Notes on analysis and severe storm forecasting procedures of the Air Force Global Weather Central[M]. Technical Report 200(Rev). Omaha: Air Weather Service, 1972: 181. [3] MOLLER A R. Severe local storms forecasting[M]//DoswellⅢC A. Severe Convective Storms. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society, 2001: 433-480. [4] MACGORMAN D, FILIAGGI T, HOLLE R, et al. Negative cloud-to-ground lightning flash rates relative to VIL, maximum reflectivity, cell height, and cell isolation[J]. Lightning Res, 2007, 1: 132-147. [5] 孙继松, 陶祖钰. 强对流天气分析与预报中的若干基本问题[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(2): 164-173. [6] 高晓梅, 俞小鼎, 王令军, 等. 鲁中地区分类强对流天气环境参量特征分析[J]. 气象学报, 2018, 76(2): 196-212. [7] 支树林, 李婕, 陈娟. 江西不同类型强对流天气的地闪统计特征及与雷达回波特征对比分析[J]. 气象, 2018, 44(2): 222-232. [8] 许爱华, 孙继松, 许东蓓, 等. 中国中东部强对流天气的天气形势分类和基本要素配置特征[J]. 气象, 2014, 40(4): 400-411. [9] 符式红, 王秀明, 俞小鼎. 相似环流背景下海南两次不同类型强对流天气对比研究[J]. 气象学报, 2018, 76(5): 742-754. [10] 刘泽, 郭凤霞, 郑栋, 等. 一次暖云强降水主导的对流单体闪电活动特征[J]. 应用气象学报, 2020, 31(2): 185-196. [11] 马明, 林锦冰, 傅云飞. 一次强对流活动中雷电与降水廓线特征研究[J]. 气象学报, 2012, 70(4): 797-805. [12] 彭丽英, 万齐林, 王谦谦, 等. 广东中部地区雷电和CINRAD雷达回波的统计关系[J]. 热带气象学报, 2007, 23(2): 171-176. [13] 王晨曦, 郑栋, 张义军, 等. 一次雹暴过程的闪电活动特征及其与雹暴结构的关系[J]. 热带气象学报, 2014, 30(6): 1 127-1 136. [14] SCHULTZ C J, PETERSEN W A, CAREY L D. Lightning and severe weather: a comparison between total and cloud-to-ground lightning trends[J]. Wea Forecasting, 2011, 26(5): 744-755. [15] 徐燕, 孙竹玲, 周筠珺, 等. 一次具有对流合并现象的强飑线系统的闪电活动特征及其与动力场的关系[J]. 大气科学, 2018, 42(6): 1 393-1 406. [16] LIU C T, CECIL D J, ZIPSER E J, et al. Relationships between lightning flash rates and radar reflectivity vertical structure in thunderstorms over the tropical and subtropics[J]. J Geophys Res, 2012, 117(D6): D06212. [17] PESSI A T, BUSINGER S. The impact of lightning data assimilation on a winter storm simulation over the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2009, 137(10): 3 177-3 195. [18] PESSI A T. Characteristics of lightning and radar reflectivity in continental and oceanic thunderstorms[C]//93th Annual American Meteorological Society Meeting. Austin: AMS, 2013. [19] 孙玉婷, 赖安伟, 王明欢, 等. 基于地形差异的闪电频数与雷达回波关系分析[J]. 高原气象, 2019, 38(6): 1 320-1 331. [20] 梁华, 鲍书龙, 陈强, 等. FY-4卫星闪电成像仪设计与实现[J]. 上海航天, 2017, 34(4): 43-51. [21] 尹若莹, 韩威, 高志球, 等. 基于FY-4A卫星探测区域模式背景误差和观测误差估计的长波红外通道选择研究[J]. 气象学报, 2019, 77(5): 898-910.