大涡模拟试验中台风梯度风平衡分析

陈珲; 吴立广; 周星阳

doi:10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2023.010

大涡模拟试验中台风梯度风平衡分析

doi: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2023.010

复旦大学大气与海洋科学系/大气科学研究院，上海 200438

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 41675051

详细信息

通讯作者:
吴立广，男，江苏省人，教授，博士，主要从事热带气旋（台风）动力学、热带气旋活动气候变化和热带气旋活动短期气候预测方向的研究。E-mail：liguangwu@fudan.edu.cn

中图分类号: P444
计量
- 文章访问数: 233
- HTML全文浏览量: 80
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-31
- 修回日期: 2022-03-20
- 刊出日期: 2023-02-20

TYPHOON GRADIENT WIND BALANCE IN LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS

Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences/Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China

摘要

摘要: 尽管经典台风强度理论是基于梯度风平衡模型，但是已有的飞机观测资料和数值模拟研究发现，边界层中和眼墙附近存在非梯度风平衡气流，前人数值模拟发现，眼墙附近最大的超梯度风可以达到切向风速的16.7%。大涡模拟可以模拟出滚涡和龙卷尺度涡旋等小尺度系统，这些小尺度系统对梯度风平衡可能产生影响，使用中尺度天气预报模式结合大涡模拟（WRF-LES）对模拟台风内核区域方位角平均的梯度风平衡进行了分析，三个大涡模拟试验的水平分辨率分别为333 m、111 m和37 m，结果表明非梯度风平衡气流并未因为分辨率提高而显著增强或产生结构差异，最大超梯度风出现在边界层顶处最大切向风半径的内侧，达到梯度风速的10.8%~16.1%。进一步分析发现，不同台风中心定位方法会影响非梯度风平衡气流，最小气压方差法和最大切向风法可以得到与前人模拟一致的结构，而气压权重法得到的低层超梯度风中心远离眼墙、靠近台风中心，位涡权重法得到的低层超梯度风的径向范围向内扩大，最小气压方差法和最大切向风法更适合用于梯度风平衡研究中的台风中心定位。
- 台风 /
- 大涡模拟 /
- 梯度风平衡
Abstract: Despite considerable typhoon intensity theories are based on gradient wind balance models, there exist unbalanced flows in the boundary layer and the vicinity of eyewall as shown in aircraft measurements and numerical simulations. Approximately 16.7% of the tangential wind close to the eyewall is unbalanced in previous simulations. The large eddy simulation (LES) with Advanced Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) is capable of simulating the horizontal rolls and tornado-scale vortices. To understand the possible influences of fine-scale coherent structures on unbalanced flows, the structure of azimuthally averaged flows in the simulated typhoon inner-core region is examined through three numerical experiments with respective horizontal grid sizes of 333 m, 111 m, and 37 m in the LES-WRF framework. The analysis yields that grid sizes make no pronounced difference in the structure and intensity of unbalanced flows in that the supergradient wind maxima of three experiments are located inside the radius of maximum wind at the top of the boundary layer and the maxima range from 10.8% to 16.1% of tangential wind velocities. Though the structure of unbalanced flows is insensitive to the mesh resolution, typhoon center-detecting methods have impacts on the structure. The minimum pressure variance center and the maximum tangential wind center show structures similar with that of previous simulations, comparing with which the pressure centroid center displays the supergradient wind maximum away from the eyewall but close to the typhoon center at lower troposphere and the potential vorticity centroid expands the low-level supergradient wind radially. This study suggests that the minimum pressure variance center and the maximum tangential wind center both perform well in the study of gradient wind balance.
- typhoon /
- large eddy simulation /
- gradient wind balance

HTML全文

图 1 10 m高度最大瞬时风速（a）和10 m高度方位角平均最大风速（b）

黑色实线表示LES-333，蓝色表示LES-111，红色表示LES-37。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 LES-333（a、d、g）、LES-111（b、e、h）和LES-37（c、f、i）试验分别在积分24小时、30小时和36小时的3 km高度雷达反射率

黑色实线为最大切向风半径（RMW）。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 LES-333（a）、LES-111（b）和LES-37（c）在积分30小时东北方向的半径-高度剖面图

等值线为切向风，等值线间隔5 m/s，填色为雷达反射率，矢量箭头为垂直环流。黑色粗实线为RMW。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 积分30小时LES-333中MVC方法计算的切向风（等值线）和径向风（填色）分布(a)、MVC与MTC的切向风差值（等值线）和径向风差值（填色）分布(b)、MVC与PCC的差值(c)以及MVC与PVC的差值(d)

黑色粗实线为MVC的RMW，红色粗实线为另三种方法各自的RMW。a中等值线间隔4 m/s，b~d中等值线间隔1 m/s。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 LES-333试验积分24~36小时的方位角平均切向风（填色）和非梯度风（等值线）分布(a)；径向风（填色）和非梯度风（等值线）分布(b)

其中红色为超梯度风，蓝色为次梯度风，黑色虚线为RMW。等值线间隔1 m/s。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 积分24~36小时LES-333（a）、LES-111（b）和LES-37（c）的方位角平均非梯度风（等值线）和非梯度风与梯度风比值，即非平衡度（填色）

垂直方向0~3 km，分辨率为100 m，等值线间隔1 m/s。径向方向使用RMW进行标准化。紫色虚线为动力边界层高度。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 积分30小时LES-333中MVC方法(a)、MTC方法(b)、PCC方法(c)和PVC方法(d)计算的非梯度风（等值线）

红色为超梯度，蓝色为次梯度，黑色虚线为RMW。等值线间隔1 m/s。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 积分24~36小时，LES-333（a）、LES-111（b）和LES-37（c）的方位角平均非梯度风

其中0~5 km高度垂直分辨率为100 m，5~16 km高度垂直分辨率为200 m。红色为超梯度，蓝色为次梯度，黑色虚线为RMW。等值线间隔1 m/s。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 积分24~36小时LES-333（a）、LES-111（b）和LES-37（c）的方位角平均非梯度力（单位：m/s²）

垂直方向0~5 km，分辨率为100 m，等值线间隔0.4 m/s²，径向方向使用RMW进行标准化。紫色虚线为动力边界层高度。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(25)

[1]	OOYAMA K. Numerical simulation of the life cycle of tropical cyclones[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1969, 26(1): 3-40.
[2]	OOYAMA K. Conceptual evolution of the theory and modeling of the tropical cyclone[J]. J Meteor Soc Japan, 1982, 60(1): 369-380.
[3]	EMANUEL K A. An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part Ⅰ: Steady-state maintenance[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1986, 43(6): 585-605.
[4]	EMANUEL K A. The maximum intensity of hurricanes[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1988, 45(7): 1 143-1 155.
[5]	EMANUEL K A. Sensitivity of tropical cyclones to surface exchange coefficients and a revised steady-state model incorporating eye dynamics[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1995, 52(22): 3 969-3 976.
[6]	EMANUEL K A. Some aspects of hurricane inner-core dynamics and energetics[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1997, 54(8): 1 014-1 026.
[7]	SMITH R K, MONTGOMERY M T, VOGL S. A critique of Emanuel's hurricane model and potential intensity theory[J]. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 2008, 134(632): 551-561.
[8]	MONTGOMERY M T, SMITH R K. Comments on"Revisiting the balanced and unbalanced aspects of tropical cyclone intensification"[J]. J Atmos Sci, 2018, 75(7): 2 491-2 496.
[9]	GRAY W M, SHEA D J. The hurricane's inner core region Ⅱ. Thermal stability and dynamic characteristics[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1973, 30(8): 1 565-1 576.
[10]	WILLOUGHBY H E. Gradient balance in tropical cyclones[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1990, 47(2): 265-274.
[11]	BELL M M, MONTGOMERY M T. Observed structure, evolution, and potential intensity of category 5 Hurricane Isabel(2003) from 12 to 14 September[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2008, 136(6): 2 023-2 046.
[12]	ZHANG D L, LIU Y, YAU M K. A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew(1992). Part Ⅳ: Unbalanced flows[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2001, 129(1): 92-107.
[13]	LIU Y, ZHANG D L, YAU M K. A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part Ⅰ: Explicit simulation and verification[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1997, 125(12): 3 073-3 093.
[14]	WU L, LIU Q, LI Y. Prevalence of tornado-scale vortices in the tropical cyclone eyewall[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 2018, 115(33): 8 307-8 310.
[15]	WU L, CHEN X. Revisiting the steering principle of tropical cyclone motion in a numerical experiment[J]. Atmos Chem Physics, 2016, 16(23): 14 925-14 936.
[16]	QIN N N, ZHANG D L, MILLER W, et al. On the rapid intensification of Hurricane Wilma (2005). Part Ⅳ: Inner-core dynamics during the steady radius of maximum wind stage[J]. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 2018, 144(717): 2 508-2 523.
[17]	WEATHERFORD C L, GRAY W M. Typhoon structure as revealed by aircraft reconnaissance. Part Ⅰ: Data analysis and climatology[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1988, 116(5): 1 032-1 043.
[18]	RYGLICKI D R, HART R E. An investigation of center-finding techniques for tropical cyclones in mesoscale models[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2015, 54(4): 825-846.
[19]	NGUYEN L T, MOLINARI J, THOMAS D. Evaluation of tropical cyclone center identification methods in numerical models[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2014, 142(11): 4 326-4 339.
[20]	YANG H, WU L, XIE T. Comparisons of four methods for tropical cyclone center detection in a high-resolution simulation[J]. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2020, 98(2): 379-393.
[21]	吴立广, 刘青元, 周星阳. 热带气旋边界层精细结构研究综述[J]. 气象科学, 2020, 40(1): 1-10.
[22]	MADDOX R A. An objective technique for separating macroscale and mesoscale features in meteorological data[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1980, 108(8): 1 108-1 121.
[23]	BRYAN G H., ROTUNNO R. The maximum intensity of tropical cyclones in axisymmetric numerical model simulations[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2009, 137(6): 1 770-1 789.
[24]	ZHANG J A, ROGERS R F, NOLAN D S, et al. On the characteristic height scales of the hurricane boundary layer[J]. Mon Wea Rev 2011, 139(8): 2 523-2 535.
[25]	SMITH R K, MONTGOMERY M T, SANG N V. Tropical cyclone spin-up revisited[J]. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 2009, 135(642): 1 321-1 335.