不同分辨率对淮河流域连续暴雨过程影响的中尺度模拟试验

邓莲堂; 史学丽; 闫之辉

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2012.02.003

不同分辨率对淮河流域连续暴雨过程影响的中尺度模拟试验

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2012.02.003

1.
国家数值预报中心, 北京 100081
2.
国家气候中心, 北京 100081

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金《我国梅雨锋暴雨物理结构的分析与模拟》课题(40875064)资助

计量
- 文章访问数: 1816
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 1797
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2010-05-18
- 修回日期: 2011-12-18

MESOSCALE SIMULATION OF A HEAVY RAINFALL IN THE HUAIHE RIVER VALLEY IN JULY 2003: EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT HORIZONTAL RESOLUTIONS

1.
National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China
2.
National Climate Center, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 利用NCAR 和NOAA 发展的新一代中尺度模式WRF(Weather Research and Forecast),对2003年7 月上旬发生在我国淮河流域三个连续暴雨过程(7 月1—11 日)进行了数值模拟试验,研究的重点是了解不同水平分辨率(45、30、20 和10 km)对WRF 模拟结果的影响。模拟结果与观测的比较表明,WRF 模式能够合理地模拟不同时段的降水带以及平均环流形势的分布特征,对于区域平均等压面上的物理量也有较好的模拟性能。不同分辨率的模拟结果比较表明:不同分辨率对降水的模拟效果影响较大,提高模式水平分辨率有助于预报效果的改善,但高分辨率模拟的降水强度偏强,空报偏多;不同分辨率对环流形势的模拟效果影响不大,各个分辨率的低层风场误差都存在一个5～6 天的波动,并向模式的中高层传播,传播速度约为3 天。
- WRF模式 /
- 连续暴雨 /
- 分辨率 /
- 淮河流域
Abstract: Numerical simulation experiments have been conducted with the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model with different horizontal resolutions and physical parameterization schemes to investigate the effects of resolution on the model performances in reproducing a abnormally prolonged heavy rainfall process in the Huaihe river valley in early July 2003 (1^st—11^th).
This paper focuses on the resolution impact on the simulation results. The comparisons between the model results with different resolutions (45 km, 30 km, 20 km and 10 km) and observations have indicated that the model has a basic and reasonable reproduction of the rainfall belt, the circulation characteristics over different periods, as well as the regional mean variables. The performance of rainfall simulation improves significantly with increased horizontal resolution, but that of circulation modeling is not affected as much. The errors of modeled wind in the model low levels all have the characteristics of fluctuation and propagate to the upper lever at the same time.
- WRF model /
- heavy rainfall /
- horizontal resolution /
- Huaihe River valley

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	WARNER T R, PETERSON R A, TREASON R E. A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as basic and potentially serious limitations to regional numerical weather prediction[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1997, 78(11): 2 599-2 617.
[2]	齐艳军,程明虎,仪清菊. 98.7 湖北特大暴雨的天气分析与降水模拟[J ]. 气象, 2004, 30 (3): 12-16.
[3]	扬建才,李晓霞,苏志侠. 高、低分辨率模式对典型个例的对比预报试验[J]. 高原气象,1996,15(1):90-97.
[4]	李锁锁, 吕世华, 高艳红,等. 模式水平分辨率对祁连山地区降水模拟影响的初步分析[J ]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(4): 496-502.
[5]	姜勇强, 张维桓, 周祖刚. 模式水平分辨率提高对一段大暴雨预报结果的影响[J]. 高原气象,2006,25(6): 1 071-1 082.
[6]	周天军,钱永甫. 模式水平分辨率影响积云对流参数化效果的数值试验[J]. 高原气象,1996,15(2):204-211.
[7]	郭英香,闫之辉,巨克英,等. 一次高原东部强降水过程在不同水平分辨率下的数值模拟[J]. 青海科技,2009(6):57-61.
[8]	寥洞贤. 论当前大气动力模式中存在的若干问题[J]. 应用气象学报,1996,7(2):238- 245.
[9]	MICHALAKES J, et al. “Development of a next-generation regional weather research and forecast model” in Developments in Teracomputing: Proceedings of the Ninth ECMWF Workshop on the Use of High Performance Computing in Meteorology[C]. Eds. Walter Zwieflhofer and Norbert Kreitz. Singapore: World Scientific, 2001: 269-276.
[10]	孙健, 赵平. 用WRF 与MM5 模拟1998 年三次暴雨过程的对比分析[J]. 气象学报,2003, 61(6): 692-701.
[11]	陈炯,郑永光,邓莲堂, 等. WRF 模式中不同边界层参数化方案对2003 年7 月江淮暴雨的数值模拟及其比较[C]// 中国气象学会水文气象学委员会. 新世纪气象科技创新与大气科学发展-03.7 淮河大水的水文气象学问题. 北京:气象出版社,2003: 221-224.
[12]	马旭林, 刘还珠, 薛纪善, 等. 江淮梅雨锋强暴雨低涡系统发生发展的数值研究[J]. 南京气象学院学报,2004, 27(3): 347-355.
[13]	张芳华, 马旭林, 杨克明. 2003 年6 月24-25 日江南特大暴雨数值模拟和诊断分析[J]. 气象,2004, 30(1): 28-32.
[14]	ZHANG D L, ZHENG W Z, XUE Y K. A numerical study of early summer regional climate and weather over lSA-East, Part I: Model implementation and verification[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2003, 131(8): 1895-1909.
[15]	MLAWER E J, TAUBMAN S J, BROWN P D, et al. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave[J]. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102(D14): 16 663-16 682.
[16]	DUDIA J. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1989, 46(20): 3 077-3 107.
[17]	MONIN A S, OBUKHOV A M. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the ground layer of the atmosphere[J]. Tr Geofiz Inst Akad Nauk SSSR, 1954, 151: 163-187.
[18]	CHEN F, DUDIA J. Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 2001, 129(4): 569-585.
[19]	HONG SY, PAN H L. Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1996, 124(10): 2 322- 2 339.
[20]	KAIN J S, FRITSCH J M. A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization[J]. J Atmos Sci, 1990, 47(23): 2 784-2 802.
[21]	毕宝贵,矫梅燕,廖要明,等. 2003 年淮河流域大洪水的雨情、水情特征分析[C]// 中国气象学会水文气象学委员会.新世纪气象科技创新与大气科学发展-03.7 淮河大水的水文气象学问题. 北京:气象出版社,2003:18-21.
[22]	时珍玲,徐敏. 2003 年夏季淮河流域洪涝成因分析[C]//中国气象学会水文气象学委员会. 新世纪气象科技创新与大气科学发展-03.7 淮河大水的水文气象学问题. 北京: 气象出版社,2003: 67-72.
[23]	王雨. 2002 年主汛期国家气象中心主客观降水预报对比检验[J]. 气象,2003, 5(1):21-25.